Cycurion Panoptic · Risk-based vulnerability management

One Risk Index for everything you own.

Panoptic scores every asset on what it is, what is wrong with it and how likely that flaw is to be used, then puts the fixes in order.

Overview

Where do we stand today?

One Risk Index from 0 to 100, what moved it this week in plain English, and a fix plan ranked by how much each fix lowers the score.

OverviewScored today, 2:04 AM
68
HighRisk Index, 0 to 100
180Assets
10,636Open vulns
192Patches ready

Fix plan, ranked by how much each fix lowers the score

  • Windows Graphics Component remote code execution−1.3
  • Google Chrome vulnerabilities (stable channel update)−1.3
  • Windows Print Spooler remote code execution−1.1

Inside Cycurion Panoptic

Every screen answers one question.

01 · VulnerabilitiesWhich flaws matter most?

Every finding carries its threat indicators, its CISA KEV status and its EPSS likelihood, sorted by the Panoptic Index. The dangerous ones rise and the noisy ones sink.

Vulnerabilities232 of 232

232 distinct vulnerabilities across 10,636 asset-findings, sorted by Panoptic Index

  • Windows Print Spooler remote code execution64KEVEPSS 96%81 assets · Re-opened
  • Windows Graphics Component remote code execution63KEVEPSS 76%92 assets · Zero day
  • Apache Log4j denial of service (Log4Shell family)48KEVEPSS 81%14 assets · Public exploit
02 · AssetsWhich machines carry the risk?

Every reporting asset with its role, operating system and its own Asset Risk Index. A domain controller weighs more than a workstation, and the list shows it.

Assets180 reporting

15 have not reported in 30 days or more

  • NWH-DC01100Primary Domain Controller · Windows Server 2019 · 49 open
  • NWH-FS01100Member Server · Windows Server 2012 R2 End of life · 52 open
  • NWH-EHR-APP2100Member Server · Rocky Linux 9 · 40 open
03 · SimulateWhat would an attacker do with this?

Pick a scenario and Panoptic runs it against your real findings: the most likely path, how many assets it reaches, the time to impact, and the fixes that break the path.

RansomwareThis morning’s scoring run
6889
CriticalRisk Index if this lands
158Assets reachable
11 hrsTime to impact
2.1 TBPHI and imaging at risk

Most likely attack path

  1. AttackerInternet
  2. NWH-WEB01Entry point
  3. NWH-EHR-APP1Server
  4. NWH-FS01Server
  5. NWH-BKUP02Server

Fixes that break this path

  1. Redis server remote code execution (Lua sandbox escape)
  2. Windows SMB version 1 (SMBv1) detected
  3. Rocky Linux security update for kernel
04 · TrendsIs it getting better?

The Risk Index over time, open findings by severity, and what your team remediated each month. Every chart uses the same nightly scoring run.

Risk Index, last 90 daysJun 11 to Sep 8
68
High▼ 4 over 30 days
65.3Best
77.9Worst
1.6KFixed last month
05 · ControlsAre we configured safely?

Security configuration findings against DISA STIG benchmarks, by control and by policy. Kept beside the Risk Index, never folded into it.

ControlsLast audit Sep 4

31,468 findings on 158 evaluated assets

  • 6,608S5 Urgent
  • 13,846S4 Critical
  • 7,867S3 Serious
  • 2,989S2 Medium

Top control

  • “Access Credential Manager as a trusted caller” right1585 Urgent · STIG WIN11 · assets affected

How the score is built

Risk in context, not a list of CVEs.

Six kinds of data go in. Four layers turn them into one score. Four things come out.

01 · Data in

Asset discoveryIT, OT and cloud, containers, applications
VulnerabilityScanners, repositories, threat intel, CVE data
ConfigurationCIS benchmarks, misconfigurations, policy data
Identity & accessUsers, groups, permissions, entitlements
Business contextCritical assets, data sensitivity, regulatory
Threat intelligenceExploit data, adversary activity, campaigns

02 · The Panoptic engine

Exploded schematic of the Panoptic engine, four scoring layers on a base
  1. CorrelateUnify assets, map vulnerabilities, apply threat context, model exploit paths.
  2. AnalyzeCalculate risk, assess exploit likelihood, weigh business impact.
  3. EnrichEnvironmental context, attack path analysis, dependency mapping, compensating controls.
  4. PrioritizeRisk-based ranking, remediation pathways, continuous updates.

03 · What you get

Prioritized riskRisk score, business impact, exploit likelihood, ranking
Remediation guidanceStep-by-step actions, prioritized queue, validation criteria
Trend & exposureAttack surface trends, compliance alignment, executive reporting
Asset intelligenceRelationships, dependencies, criticality, data flows
Component scoringAsset, threat vector and vulnerability, scored together.
Likelihood built inCISA KEV and FIRST EPSS weight every finding.
Verified, not claimedOnly a scan lowers the score.
Executive reportOne click, from the data on screen.

Sources: CISA KEV catalog 2026.10.01, FIRST EPSS scores dated Oct 1, 2026.

Works with

Cycurion FathomSee how Panoptic exposure joins Habit behavior to predict the attack path.Cycurion HabitSee what it catches, verifies and shuts down.

Predict. Protect. Prevail.

See it on your own environment.

Book a demo and we will walk these screens with your questions, not ours.

Book a demo See Cycurion Fathom
Book a demo